In one of the items of his canonical book Effective Java Joshua Bloch describes what's necessary to keep in mind in order to write meaningful Javadoc comments.

It's quite detailed, so whenever I want to write some Javadoc I find myself searching and skimming the appropriate item (it's Item 44: Write doc comments for all exposed API elements) to refresh my porous memory. After doing this a couple of times it became too annoying. So, for my future reference, I decided to compile a very brief and condensed summary of the aspects expressed there that matter most to me. Maybe it can be useful for others, too. But it's by no means meant to substitute a careful reading of Bloch's original text.

The first and golden rule is: Write a doc comment for every exported element. No exceptions, no excuses! And remember that you are writing those Javadoc comments not just for yourself but also for your present and future fellow programmers. So try to be nice to them. They will be full of eternal gratitude if one of your Javadoc comments ever helps them to get their job done.

The following recommendations apply to all types of doc comments.

  • When using HTML meta characters that are not inside a {@code} tag already, they must be surrounded with a {@literal} tag. It has the same effect, but without rendering the content with a monospaced font.
  • Take care that the doc comment looks good in the source and as rendered documentation. If that's really not achievable, readability in the rendered version is more important.
  • The first sentence of a doc comment represents the summary description. It has to stand on its own describing the functionality of the respective element. No two members of a class or interface may have the same summary description. Pay particular attention to this rule when documenting overloaded methods or constructors. The summary description should usually not be a grammatically full sentence.
    • Instead, for a class, interface or field the summary description should be a noun phrase describing what's represented by the field or an instance of the class or interface.
    • And for a method or constructor, the summary description should be a verb phrase describing the action it performs.

When writing doc comments for methods, the following aspects are important to keep in mind.

  • A methods doc comment should describe its contract with the caller. This contract is about what the method does, not how it does it.
  • The comment should enumerate the method's pre- and postconditions and describe its side effects.
  • There should be a @param tag for every parameter, a @throws tag for every exception thrown, and @return tag for the return type, if it's not void.
  • By convention the word 'this' in an instance method's doc comment refers to the object the method is invoked on.

Here's an example from Google's Guava library that nicely illustrates most of the above:

 * Reads all of the lines from a file. The lines do not include line-termination characters, but
 * do include other leading and trailing whitespace.
 * <p>This method returns a mutable {@code List}. For an {@code ImmutableList}, use
 * {@code Files.asCharSource(file, charset).readLines()}.
 * @param file the file to read from
 * @param charset the charset used to decode the input stream; see {@link StandardCharsets} for
 *     helpful predefined constants
 * @return a mutable {@link List} containing all the lines
 * @throws IOException if an I/O error occurs
public static List<String> readLines(File file, Charset charset) throws IOException {

And here are a few more things to keep in mind:

  • Don't forget to document all type parameters when writing a comment for a generic type or method.
  • The comment for an enum type should contain documentation of the type, the constants and the public methods.
  • An annotation type's comment should document the type itself and all of it's members.